limits on free speech 6 12

Free speech has long been a cornerstone of democratic societies, allowing individuals to express their opinions and ideas without fear of retribution or censorship. However, as we enter a new era of communication, the rules of engagement for free speech are being tested in ways we never imagined. The internet and social media have opened Pandora's box of caustic, disruptive, and dishonest speech that threatens to undermine the very foundations of our society.

In the past, when someone expressed an opinion deemed harmful or destructive, society often used a disproving glance or outright ostracization to tamp down such speech. However, the internet has made it easier for individuals to express their opinions anonymously or under a screen name, making it more challenging to hold people accountable for their words.

The result has been a proliferation of hate speech, cyberbullying, and misinformation that can potentially cause actual harm. We've seen this in the rise of online harassment and trolling, which can devastate individuals, particularly those in marginalized communities. We've also seen it in the spread of conspiracy theories and disinformation, which can undermine the public's trust in government institutions and even threaten public health.

Autocratic Leaders Can Divide People with Speech

In addition to the challenges posed by harmful speech in the digital age, another significant concern is how autocratic leaders and their followers can exploit "free speech" to divide people and consolidate power. Dictatorial regimes have historically used propaganda and inflammatory rhetoric to manipulate public opinion, suppress dissent, and foster community divisiveness.

Autocratic leaders often employ various tactics to control the narrative and shape public discourse. They may vilify specific groups or individuals, using hate speech and creating an "us versus them" mentality. This divisive rhetoric can fuel social tensions, exacerbate prejudices, and foster a climate of hostility and intolerance.

innerself subscribe graphic

Furthermore, these leaders and their followers may resort to disinformation campaigns to sow confusion and undermine trust in democratic institutions. By spreading falsehoods and conspiracy theories, they can delegitimize opposition, create a climate of skepticism, and erode the foundations of an informed and cohesive society.

This manipulation of speech is a calculated strategy to maintain power and control over the populace. By exploiting fear, prejudice, and misinformation, autocratic leaders can stifle dissent, suppress independent thought, and undermine the principles of free speech.

We must recognize and resist these divisive tactics. Promoting media literacy and critical thinking becomes even more essential in combating the spread of propaganda and disinformation. By equipping individuals with the skills to discern between truth and falsehood, we can foster a society that is resilient to the divisive strategies employed by autocratic leaders.

Ultimately, understanding how speech can be used to divide people underscores the importance of protecting free speech while being aware of the potential dangers. By fostering an informed and united society, we can collectively resist the divisive strategies employed by autocratic regimes and uphold the principles of democracy and freedom of expression.

Mass Psychosis - How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill

Finding the Balance

The question then becomes: how do we balance the right to free speech with the need to protect individuals and society from the harm caused by harmful speech?

Some have argued that it is the government's role to step in and regulate speech on the internet. However, this is a complex issue and one that is fraught with potential pitfalls. The government's involvement in regulating speech raises severe concerns about censorship and infringement on free speech rights.

There is also the question of who decides what speech is harmful or disruptive. It's easy to imagine a scenario where a government agency with too much power could use censorship to silence dissenting voices and stifle legitimate criticism. That has happened in numerous countries ruled by dictators or autocratic regimes.

That said, there is an argument to be made for government intervention in regulating harmful speech. After all, the government already regulates speech in certain areas, such as prohibiting hate speech and incitement to violence. If we accept that these forms of speech can cause harm, then it stands to reason that other forms of harmful speech could also be regulated.

The key is balancing protecting individuals and society from harmful speech while upholding the right to free speech. One way to do this is by using the "wisdom of the crowd" to help regulate speech. This means empowering individuals to report harmful speech and enabling platforms to take action against it.

Empowering Individuals Through Media Literacy

It is crucial to empower individuals with media literacy and critical thinking skills to address the challenges of harmful speech and misinformation in the digital age. We can foster a more informed and responsible society by equipping people with the tools to evaluate information and identify propaganda and bias.

Several countries and organizations around the world have recognized the importance of media literacy and have taken steps to promote it:

  • Finland: Finland has been at the forefront of media literacy education. The Finnish education system incorporates media literacy into its curriculum, teaching students how to navigate the vast sea of information available online and critically analyze its credibility. Students learn to fact-check information, verify sources, and recognize standard propaganda techniques.

  • Canada: In Canada, MediaSmarts is an organization that provides resources and programs to promote media literacy among children, youth, and adults. They offer educational resources for teachers, workshops for parents, and interactive online games and lessons for students.

  • Australia: The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has developed the eSafety Commissioner program, which promotes online safety and digital literacy. They offer resources, training, and awareness campaigns to help individuals navigate the online world responsibly and identify potential risks.

  • United Kingdom: The UK has implemented various media literacy initiatives through organizations like the Media Literacy Network and Ofcom, the communications regulator. They provide resources, guidelines, and educational programs to enhance media literacy skills and empower individuals to evaluate information critically.

  • United States: In the United States, organizations like the National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE) and Common Sense Media have been actively promoting media literacy. NAMLE offers educators resources, conferences, and professional development opportunities. At the same time, Common Sense Media provides tools and resources for parents and teachers to help children navigate the digital landscape safely.

  • UNESCO: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has emphasized the importance of media and information literacy worldwide. They have supported various initiatives across different countries, aiming to equip individuals with the skills to critically analyze media content, recognize misinformation, and share responsible information.

These examples highlight a global effort to promote media literacy and critical thinking skills. By learning from successful initiatives and adapting them to local contexts, countries and organizations can empower individuals to navigate the digital world effectively and make informed decisions.

Furthermore, media literacy programs can be extended to adults, ensuring that people of all ages have the skills to discern between reliable sources and misinformation. Organizations and institutions can provide workshops, webinars, and online resources that equip individuals with the tools to navigate the digital landscape responsibly. By fostering a society that values critical thinking and media literacy, we can create a culture that is less susceptible to harmful speech and misinformation.

Media Literacy

The Importance of an Informed and Responsible Society

Ultimately, the concept of free speech is a complex issue that requires thoughtful consideration and debate. We must find ways to balance the right to free speech with the need to protect individuals and society from the harm caused by harmful speech. While government intervention may be necessary in some cases, we must ensure that it does not lead to censorship or infringement on free speech rights.

By empowering individuals and investing in media literacy, we can create a more informed and responsible society that can navigate the challenges of the digital age while upholding the principles of free speech. When individuals are equipped with the skills to evaluate information and platforms critically and engage the community in shaping their policies, we can mitigate the negative impact of harmful speech while preserving the essential values of freedom of expression.

We must continue to explore and refine our approach to this issue. Through ongoing research, open dialogue, and collaborative efforts, we can strike a balance that ensures the vitality of free speech while safeguarding the well-being of individuals and the fabric of our society in the digital age.

Freedom of Speech: Government and Politics

About the Author

jenningsRobert Jennings is co-publisher of with his wife Marie T Russell. He attended the University of Florida, Southern Technical Institute, and the University of Central Florida with studies in real estate, urban development, finance, architectural engineering, and elementary education. He was a member of the US Marine Corps and The US Army having commanded a field artillery battery in Germany. He worked in real estate finance, construction and development for 25 years before starting in 1996.

InnerSelf is dedicated to sharing information that allows people to make educated and insightful choices in their personal life, for the good of the commons, and for the well-being of the planet. InnerSelf Magazine is in its 30+year of publication in either print (1984-1995) or online as Please support our work.

 Creative Commons 4.0

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. Attribute the author Robert Jennings, Link back to the article This article originally appeared on


Related Books:

On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century

by Timothy Snyder

This book offers lessons from history for preserving and defending democracy, including the importance of institutions, the role of individual citizens, and the dangers of authoritarianism.

Click for more info or to order

Our Time Is Now: Power, Purpose, and the Fight for a Fair America

by Stacey Abrams

The author, a politician and activist, shares her vision for a more inclusive and just democracy and offers practical strategies for political engagement and voter mobilization.

Click for more info or to order

How Democracies Die

by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt

This book examines the warning signs and causes of democratic breakdown, drawing on case studies from around the world to offer insights into how to safeguard democracy.

Click for more info or to order

The People, No: A Brief History of Anti-Populism

by Thomas Frank

The author offers a history of populist movements in the United States and critiques the "anti-populist" ideology that he argues has stifled democratic reform and progress.

Click for more info or to order

Democracy in One Book or Less: How It Works, Why It Doesn't, and Why Fixing It Is Easier Than You Think

by David Litt

This book offers an overview of democracy, including its strengths and weaknesses, and proposes reforms to make the system more responsive and accountable.

Click for more info or to order