You’re no more likely to lose heat from your head than other parts of your body – except your hands and feet. Taylor Mackenzie
WQhen the weather starts to cool down and winter clothes enter rotation in our wardrobes, some peculiar combinations emerge: shorts and scarves; thongs and jackets; T-shirts and beanies. The last is often explained with an old saying: you lose most of your head through your head. But, in fact, scientists know this to be untrue.
Firstly, let’s go back to the basics of heat exchange.
Human heat exchange is dictated by a combination of physical principles, variations in body shape and size, and physiological control mechanisms such as altered skin blood flow, shivering and sweating. These interactions maintain a stable deep-body temperature, which is typically just below 37°C.
While survivable extremes of 13.7°C and 46.5°C have been reported, you’re likely to feel miserable and unwell when this temperature drops below 35°C or rises above 40°C.
Looking beyond the body, heat is exchanged between all objects via dry pathways (radiation, convection, conduction) and through the evaporation of moisture.
For dry pathways, thermal energy moves from hotter to cooler regions, with its exchange rate depending on the temperature difference between these objects.
For evaporative cooling, water molecules leave moist surfaces to enter less humid air, taking heat with them.
Get The Latest From InnerSelf
These are the first principles of heat exchange.
Body shape and size
Heat is likely to be lost more rapidly from larger surfaces. Nevertheless, large masses have greater thermal stability, and resist rapid and significant changes in temperature. Thus, the interaction between surface area and mass provides another first principle: the temperature change of any object is dictated by the ratio of its surface area to its mass.
So a wafer-thin rectangular prism losses heat remarkably quickly, while a sphere, which has the smallest surface area to volume ratio of any object, provides the greatest resistance to heat loss. The relatively spherical shape of the human head, therefore, leads us to challenge the heat-loss myth on the basis of first-principles science.
But we can’t ignore the physiological control of skin blood flow, as this is how heat is transported to the skin for dissipation, and sweating, which facilitates heat loss when the air is hotter than the skin.
There are many examples of how natural selection led to physiological changes to support temperature regulation. Take the toco toucan: the large surface area of this bird’s bill, in combination with its blood supply, enables very efficient heat dissipation. The same applies to elephant ears.
In humans, the closest equivalents are the hands and feet.
The head is not an ideal radiator, even though it has many blood vessels close to its surface, since its skin blood flow does not vary significantly when one is either resting comfortably or dramatically cooled. Even when someone has a dangerously high temperature, head skin blood flow increases much less than that of the hands and feet for the same heating stimulus.
Plus most heads have about 50% hair coverage, which traps air and insulates against heat exchange. Although (sadly) not all heads conform with this generalisation.
The head is not great for evaporative cooling either. While the forehead is the most prolific sweat secretion site per unit area when we’re resting, sweating from sites inside the hairline occurs at half this rate.
In fact, the head represents only about 7% of the body surface area, so its contribution to whole-body evaporative cooling at rest is only 10%, and less than that of the hand, back, thigh and lower leg. While this heat loss can triple during exercise, it still accounts for only 13% of total evaporation.
So it would seem that even though the temperature of the head makes it well suited to losing heat, neither its geometry nor its physiological responses to heating or cooling make it a critical site for heat loss.
Covering your head is no more effective at keeping you warm than covering most other body regions. In other words, you’re no more likely to lose heat from your head than other parts of your body – except your hands and feet. So wearing gloves and socks is your best bet.
About the Author
Nigel Taylor, Associate Professor of Thermal Physiology, University of Wollongong
The Human Swarm: How Our Societies Arise, Thrive, and Fall
by Mark W. Moffett
If a chimpanzee ventures into the territory of a different group, it will almost certainly be killed. But a New Yorker can fly to Los Angeles--or Borneo--with very little fear. Psychologists have done little to explain this: for years, they have held that our biology puts a hard upper limit--about 150 people--on the size of our social groups. But human societies are in fact vastly larger. How do we manage--by and large--to get along with each other? In this paradigm-shattering book, biologist Mark W. Moffett draws on findings in psychology, sociology and anthropology to explain the social adaptations that bind societies. He explores how the tension between identity and anonymity defines how societies develop, function, and fail. Surpassing Guns, Germs, and Steel and Sapiens, The Human Swarm reveals how mankind created sprawling civilizations of unrivaled complexity--and what it will take to sustain them. Available On Amazon
Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
by Jay H. Withgott, Matthew Laposata
Environment: The Science behind the Stories is a best seller for the introductory environmental science course known for its student-friendly narrative style, its integration of real stories and case studies, and its presentation of the latest science and research. The 6th Edition features new opportunities to help students see connections between integrated case studies and the science in each chapter, and provides them with opportunities to apply the scientific process to environmental concerns. Available On Amazon
Feasible Planet: A guide to more sustainable living
by Ken Kroes
Are you concerned about the state of our planet and hope that governments and corporations will find a sustainable way for us to live? If you do not think about it too hard, that may work, but will it? Left on their own, with drivers of popularity and profits, I am not too convinced that it will. The missing part of this equation is you and me. Individuals who believe that corporations and governments can do better. Individuals who believe that through action, we can buy a bit more time to develop and implement solutions to our critical issues. Available On Amazon
From The Publisher:
Purchases on Amazon go to defray the cost of bringing you InnerSelf.com, MightyNatural.com, and ClimateImpactNews.com at no cost and without advertisers that track your browsing habits. Even if you click on a link but don't buy these selected products, anything else you buy in that same visit on Amazon pays us a small commission. There is no additional cost to you, so please contribute to the effort. You can also use this link to use to Amazon at any time so you can help support our efforts.