Why Private, For-Profit Health Care Is A Terrible Idea


Why Private, For-Profit Health Care Is A Terrible IdeaIn 2017, Saskatchewan’s auditor general showed that a private pay MRI program actually increased wait times for scans rather than the promised reduction. Here, an MRI machine is prepared at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Hospital on May 1, 2018. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young

Ontario Premier Doug Ford may be planning a two-tiered, profit-driven health-care system, according to the Toronto Star. This is clearly the wrong solution to the health-care woes of the province, and the nation as a whole.

In a letter to Ontario’s 68,000 civil servants, written on Jan. 7, Ford promised to quickly end “hallway medicine” and to adequately fund health care.

There is no question that Ontario’s health-care system needs to improve. But prioritizing care based on ability to pay instead of medical need will only exacerbate hallway medicine and wait times for all but the wealthiest patients.

Private payment increases wait times

A 2017 ranking of health-care access and quality in 195 countries gave Canada a score of 88 out of 100. That places our health system in the top 10 per cent in the world. Does this excuse inaction in areas where we must improve? Of course not, but it suggests that there are many elements of our current system worth keeping.

Evidence from Australia to Germany and Switzerland demonstrates that private payment increases wait times for the majority of patients who depend on publicly funded services and increases total system costs.

In fact, countries that outperform Canada on global rankings spend more public dollars on health care (80-85 per cent) than we do (73 per cent) and cover a broader range of services.

We don’t need to rely on international experience alone to see the folly of Ford’s privatization scheme. In 2017, Saskatchewan’s auditor general showed that a private-pay MRI program actually increased wait times for scans rather than the promised reduction.

In British Columbia, former premier Gordon Campbell, now a close adviser to Ford, happily allowed private payment and for-profit clinics to flourish. Now the Cambie Surgeries Corporation, a for-profit investor-owned facility, is fighting a constitutional challenge in the province’s Supreme Court to overturn the B.C. Medicare Protection Act.

This corporation seeks to open the doors to a second tier of private payment for medically necessary care, to allow extra-billing in excess of the public fee schedule, and to allow dual practice — so that doctors working within the public system can charge both the government and patients for the very same service.

For-profit clinics cost more

Back in 2000, the previous Ontario Conservative government under Mike Harris awarded a contract to a private for-profit group to deal with a backlog in radiation cancer treatment. The government gave the clinic $4 million in start-up costs and according to a report from the auditor general, treatment at the clinic cost $500 more per patient compared to public non-profit hospitals.

Simply, profit-driven clinics will not keep money in patients’ pockets, one of Ford’s key campaign promises.

Supporters of private payment — such as Ford — argue that it frees up resources and shortens wait lines in the public system. This is false. New doctors and nurses are not created from thin air. The majority of Canadians, who would continue to rely on a public system, would wait even longer for doctors, nurses and others who would be incentivized to work fewer hours in the public system, and more in the lucrative private pay system.

With fewer health-care workers remaining in the public system, it’s no surprise “hallway medicine” would worsen for those left behind.

Medical care must be based on need

There are evidence-based solutions that are better than for-profit care and that will ensure equitable access to care for all of us.

For example, renowned spine surgeon Dr. Raj Rampersaud launched a pilot project in Toronto that decreased the average wait time to see a spine specialist from 18 months to as little as two weeks and decreased the use of MRIs by 30 per cent.

Barbara Pereira speaks about receiving treatment for back pain at one of the Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics launched by Dr. Raj Rampersaud. These clinics have drastically cut wait times for treatment.

Another successful example is an “eConsult” project piloted in Ottawa. Built around virtual access to specialists, this reduced the need for in- person consultations by 40 per cent, with specialist advice arriving, on average, in just two days. The fastest response? Six minutes. This program is now available across Ontario.

There are many other examples of how we can shorten wait times to improve access to care, none of which overturn medicare’s fundamental principles of providing care based on need, not ability to pay.

We cannot allow a select few to profit from changes in our health-care system that will negatively impact most of us for generations to come. We need to improve how we organize and deliver our care, and adequately fund the system rather than financially starving and mismanaging it as Ford plans.

Allowing private payment is an overly simplistic solution to a complex problem. And it is wrong.The Conversation

About The Author

Sarah Giles, Lecturer in Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Danyaal Raza, Family Physician & Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, and Rupinder Brar, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of British Columbia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Related Books

The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care

healthcareAuthor: T. R. Reid
Binding: Paperback
  • Penguin Books

Brand: Penguin Books
Studio: Penguin Books
Label: Penguin Books
Publisher: Penguin Books
Manufacturer: Penguin Books

Buy Now
Editorial Review:

A New York Times Bestseller, with an updated explanation of the 2010 Health Reform Bill

Bringing to bear his talent for explaining complex issues in a clear, engaging way, New York Times bestselling author T. R. Reid visits industrialized democracies around the world--France, Britain, Germany, Japan, and beyond--to provide a revelatory tour of successful, affordable universal health care systems. Now updated with new statistics and a plain-English explanation of the 2010 health care reform bill, The Healing of America is required reading for all those hoping to understand the state of health care in our country, and around the world.

T. R. Reid's newest book, A Fine Mess, is now available from Penguin Press.

Power, Politics, and Universal Health Care: The Inside Story of a Century-Long Battle

healthcareAuthor: Stuart Altman
Binding: Hardcover
  • Senator John Kerry

Studio: Prometheus Books
Label: Prometheus Books
Publisher: Prometheus Books
Manufacturer: Prometheus Books

Buy Now
Editorial Review: Essential reading for every American who must navigate the US health care system.

Why was the Obama health plan so controversial and difficult to understand? In this readable, entertaining, and substantive book, Stuart Altman—internationally recognized expert in health policy and adviser to five US presidents—and fellow health care specialist David Shactman explain not only the Obama health plan but also many of the intriguing stories in the hundred-year saga leading up to the landmark 2010 legislation. Blending political intrigue, policy substance, and good old-fashioned storytelling, this is the first book to place the Obama health plan within a historical perspective.

The authors describe the sometimes haphazard, piece-by-piece construction of the nation’s health care system, from the early efforts of Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman to the later additions of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. In each case, they examine the factors that led to success or failure, often by illuminating little-known political maneuvers that brought about immense shifts in policy or thwarted herculean efforts at reform.

The authors look at key moments in health care history: the Hill–Burton Act in 1946, in which one determined poverty lawyer secured the rights of the uninsured poor to get hospital care; the "three-layer cake" strategy of powerful House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Wilbur Mills to enact Medicare and Medicaid under Lyndon Johnson in 1965; the odd story of how Medicare catastrophic insurance was passed by Ronald Reagan in 1988 and then repealed because of public anger in 1989; and the fact that the largest and most expensive expansion of Medicare was enacted by George W. Bush in 2003.

President Barack Obama is the protagonist in the climactic chapter, learning from the successes and failures chronicled throughout the narrative. The authors relate how, in the midst of a worldwide financial meltdown, Obama overcame seemingly impossible obstacles to accomplish what other presidents had tried and failed to achieve for nearly one hundred years.

Healing Health Care: The Case for a Commonsense Universal Health System

healthcareAuthor: John Marty
Binding: Paperback
  • Paul Nockleby

Studio: Birch Grove Publishing
Label: Birch Grove Publishing
Publisher: Birch Grove Publishing
Manufacturer: Birch Grove Publishing

Buy Now
Editorial Review: In this book John Marty makes the case for a universal health care system that is medically beneficial, fiscally responsible, and morally necessary.

Senator Marty starts by spelling out principles we should expect our health care system to follow, then lays out a commonsense plan to meet those principles. The result is a proposal to cover all people for all of their medical needs, in an accountable, comprehensible, fair, and affordable manner. Marty also cuts through and critiques layers of reforms from the Nixon era to the Obama administration that led to the current bureaucratic nightmare that causes Americans to pay almost twice as much as other advanced nations, with worse coverage and poor health outcomes. Our health care system is so dysfunctional, one business executive quipped, If you tried to design a health care system that does not work, you could not have done a better job.

This book is a well-researched, thoroughly-documented proposal that serves as a blueprint not only for Minnesota but for people across the country who are eager to create a health care system that works.


follow InnerSelf on


 Get The Latest By Email


follow InnerSelf on


 Get The Latest By Email


Support A Good Job!