Why It Takes A Lot of Brain Real Estate To Disagree
Image by Gerd Altmann 

Researchers have created a way to look into the brains of two people simultaneously while they’re talking.

What they found will not surprise anyone who has found themselves arguing about politics or social issues.

When two people agree, their brains exhibit a calm synchronicity of activity focused on sensory areas of the brain. When they disagree, however, many other regions of the brain involved in higher cognitive functions become mobilized as each individual combats the other’s argument, the researchers report.

“Our entire brain is a social processing network,” says senior author Joy Hirsch, professor of psychiatry and professor of comparative medicine and neuroscience at Yale University. “However, it just takes a lot more brain real estate to disagree than to agree.”

For the study, the researchers recruited 38 adults who were asked to say whether they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements such as “same-sex marriage is a civil right” or “marijuana should be legalized.”


innerself subscribe graphic


After matching up pairs based on their responses the researchers used an imaging technology called functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record their brain activity while they engaged in face-to-face discussions.

When the people were in agreement, brain activity was harmonious and tended to be concentrated on sensory areas of the brain such as the visual system, presumably in response to social cues from their partner. However, during disputes these areas of the brain were less active. Meanwhile, activity increased in the brain’s frontal lobes, home of higher order executive functions.

“There is a synchronicity between the brains when we agree,” Hirsch says. “But when we disagree, the neural coupling disconnects.”

Understanding how our brains function while disagreeing or agreeing is particularly important in a polarized political environment, Hirsch notes.

In discord, she says, two brains engage many emotional and cognitive resources “like a symphony orchestra playing different music.” In agreement, there “is less cognitive engagement and more social interaction between brains of the talkers, similar to a musical duet.”

About the Authors

The findings appear in Frontiers of Human Neuroscience. Additional researchers from Yale and the University College London contributed to the work.

The lead investigator of the paper is Alex Salama-Manteau, a former graduate student of economics at Yale and now a data scientist at Airbnb. Mark Tiede, a research scientist at the Haskins Laboratory at Yale, is second author of the paper.

Original Study

break

Related Books:

Crucial Conversations Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High, Second Edition

by Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, et al.

The long paragraph description goes here.

Click for more info or to order

Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

by Chris Voss and Tahl Raz

The long paragraph description goes here.

Click for more info or to order

Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High

by Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, et al.

The long paragraph description goes here.

Click for more info or to order

Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know About the People We Don't Know

by Malcolm Gladwell

The long paragraph description goes here.

Click for more info or to order

Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most

by Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, et al.

The long paragraph description goes here.

Click for more info or to order