Visual illusions show us that we do not have direct access to reality. They can also provide an inkling of the mental processing that delivers our experience of the viewable world.
Indeed, it is the processing happening inside our brains that is the basis for many illusions. Rather than delivering information from our eyes in nearly raw form as a camera would, the brain tries to determine what is actually out there – what are the shapes and the objects in the scene?
When the information entering the eye is ambiguous, the brain must make educated guesses. The three displays below demonstrate this in rather delightful ways.
The Illusion of Sex
The Illusion of Sex. Richard Russell, Author provided (No reuse)
In this illusion by Richard Russell, the same face appears to be female when the skin tone is made lighter (left image) and male when the skin tone is made darker (right image).
The illusion works because changing the skin tone affects the face’s contrast – the difference between the darkest parts of the face (lips and eyes) and lightest parts (the skin).
Even without consciously knowing it, our brains are attuned to the difference in contrast between the sexes, and so contrast is one cue the brain uses to determine gender. When other cues are removed, contrast can be the deciding factor.
Get The Latest From InnerSelf
Perhaps the most interesting thing about the illusion is that the contrast doesn’t simply help us work out the sex of the face - it provides an experience of “seeing” a face that is male or female. The use of the contrast cue is done by unconscious processes.
The image in our mind’s eye has incorporated information that we already hold, and uses this to resolve ambiguity in the image.
The Coffer Illusion
The Coffer Illusion. Anthony Norcia, Author provided (No reuse)
The Coffer Illusion may initially appear as a series of sunken rectangular door panels, but after a few seconds, your brain’s representation of the image may “flip” to give you the experience of 16 circles.
People have been fascinated by such ambiguous figures since at least the time of the ancient Romans.
Sometimes, as in the Coffer Illusion, there is no “right” grouping because the image is inherently ambiguous. Two different groupings make sense – a single set of horizontal lines can either form a circle, or be the intersection between two rectangles.
For most people, the grouping into rectangles initially dominates. This may be because rectangles (including the ones we see in door panels) are often more common than circles in our daily environment, and so the brain favours the grouping that delivers rectangular shapes.
Mask of Love
Mask of Love. Gianni A. Sarcone, Author provided (No reuse)
In Gianni Sarcone’s Mask of Love, a Venetian mask can be seen to contain either a single face or the faces of two people kissing.
The illusion operates in a similar way to the Coffer illusion – the contours in the image can be grouped in two different ways, leaving the brain uncertain about which to choose.
The difference with this illusion is that, at least for some people, neither grouping tends to dominate. The image appears to flip reasonably freely between the two plausible alternatives.
Flipping is an interesting way for the visual brain to deal with ambiguity. Other parts of the brain have mechanisms that average ambiguous information, or simply choose the most likely representation and ignore all alternatives.
Flipping has the advantage of providing coherent information about what the image could be, which might be useful to know in working out how to interact with the world.
Together, these three illusions demonstrate that visual processing is highly geared towards identifying what an object is.
The representation in our mind’s eye is designed to be functional, so rather than delivering a mess of pixels, we have elaborate visual experiences of circles, rectangles, faces, and even the gender of faces.
About The Authors
Kim Ransley, PhD student, School of Psychology, University of Sydney and Alex O. Holcombe, Associate Professor, School of Psychology, University of Sydney