A fire burns a hillside near PG&E power lines during firefighting operations against the Kincade Fire in Healdsburg, California on October 26, 2019. (Photo: Philip Pacheco/AFP via Getty Images)
Rep. Ro Khanna in an interview Friday voiced his support for public ownership of PG&E, the largest private utility company in his home state of California, as an alternative to the for-profit model that led the company to prioritize enriching investors over necessary wildfire-prevention measures.
"The for-profit motive does not work," Khanna told HuffPost. "The public utility is a much better option because you're not having to worry about maximizing shareholder returns and you will make the safety investments that are necessary."
"Ro Khanna is exactly right. Utilities need to be doing everything in their power to tackle the climate crisis and keep their customers safe, not trying to make their Wall Street investors wealthier."
—Sunrise Movement
PG&E's failure to upgrade its hazardous and outdated infrastructure after its power lines caused devastating fires in 2018—even as it poured money into lobbying and payments to investors—forced the company to temporarily cut off power to millions of Californians as heat, dry weather conditions, and high winds sparked wildfires across the state.
The bankrupt utility giant admitted its aging equipment may have played a role in causing the massive Kincade Fire in northern California, which has burned over 75,000 acres and is currently around 65 percent contained. PG&E also said downed power lines may have started two fires last month in the San Francisco Bay Area.
According to CNN, more than a dozen wildfires are currently raging across California. Khanna, who represents Silicon Valley, said "when you have the public that's running the utilities, they're going to care about the consequences of climate changes."
"They're going to support renewable energy," said the California Democrat. "They're not going to be motivated by profit."
Khanna dismissed as unworkable proposals that would leave PG&E in private hands, such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom's suggestion last weekend that billionaire Warren Buffett, owner of utility giant Berkshire Hathaway Energy, purchase PG&E.
"The idea of having a private entity like Berkshire Hathaway buy it makes no sense," said Khanna. "They're still going to be driven by profit motive."
The youth-led Sunrise Movement applauded Khanna's remarks as "exactly right."
"Utilities need to be doing everything in their power to tackle the climate crisis and keep their customers safe, not trying to make their Wall Street investors wealthier."
.@RoKhanna is exactly right: for utilities, “the for-profit motive does not work."
— Sunrise Movement ???? (@sunrisemvmt) November 1, 2019
Utilities need to be doing everything in their power to tackle the climate crisis and keep their customers safe, not trying to make their Wall Street investors wealthier. https://t.co/KG8OObWH8P
Khanna's call for a public takeover of PG&E came just days after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, said "it is time to begin thinking about public ownership of major utilities." Khanna is the national co-chair of Sanders' presidential campaign.
"Our hearts go out to Californians affected by the devastating wildfires," said Sanders, whose Green New Deal plan calls for the creation of "a modern, high-volt, underground, renewable, direct current, smart, electric transmission and distribution grid."
It is time to begin thinking about public ownership of major utilities.
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) October 27, 2019
In an op-ed for OtherWords on Wednesday, Jill Richardson wrote that "California's wildfires and blackouts show the dangers of entrusting our power to for-profit corporations."
"When we privatize our utilities, we limit the solutions we can choose from to those that are profitable to a corporation," said Richardson. "We risk situations like the one we are in now, in which the public is suffering the consequences of decisions a private entity made to maximize its own profits."
"The public interest, not private profit, should be priority No. 1," Richardson wrote. "If there's a silver lining to this mess with PG&E, it's that more people will demand that."
About The Author
Jake Johnson is a staff writer for Common Dreams. Follow him on Twitter: @johnsonjakep
This article originally appeared on Common Dreams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Related Books
Climate Adaptation Finance and Investment in California
by Jesse M. Keenan
This book serves as a guide for local governments and private enterprises as they navigate the unchartered waters of investing in climate change adaptation and resilience. This book serves not only as a resource guide for identifying potential funding sources but also as a roadmap for asset management and public finance processes. It highlights practical synergies between funding mechanisms, as well as the conflicts that may arise between varying interests and strategies. While the main focus of this work is on the State of California, this book offers broader insights for how states, local governments and private enterprises can take those critical first steps in investing in society’s collective adaptation to climate change. Available On Amazon
Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice
by Nadja Kabisch, Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler, Aletta Bonn
This open access book brings together research findings and experiences from science, policy and practice to highlight and debate the importance of nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas. Emphasis is given to the potential of nature-based approaches to create multiple-benefits for society.
The expert contributions present recommendations for creating synergies between ongoing policy processes, scientific programmes and practical implementation of climate change and nature conservation measures in global urban areas. Available On Amazon
A Critical Approach to Climate Change Adaptation: Discourses, Policies and Practices
by Silja Klepp, Libertad Chavez-Rodriguez
This edited volume brings together critical research on climate change adaptation discourses, policies, and practices from a multi-disciplinary perspective. Drawing on examples from countries including Colombia, Mexico, Canada, Germany, Russia, Tanzania, Indonesia, and the Pacific Islands, the chapters describe how adaptation measures are interpreted, transformed, and implemented at grassroots level and how these measures are changing or interfering with power relations, legal pluralismm and local (ecological) knowledge. As a whole, the book challenges established perspectives of climate change adaptation by taking into account issues of cultural diversity, environmental justicem and human rights, as well as feminist or intersectional approaches. This innovative approach allows for analyses of the new configurations of knowledge and power that are evolving in the name of climate change adaptation. Available On Amazon
From The Publisher:
Purchases on Amazon go to defray the cost of bringing you InnerSelf.comelf.com, MightyNatural.com, and ClimateImpactNews.com at no cost and without advertisers that track your browsing habits. Even if you click on a link but don't buy these selected products, anything else you buy in that same visit on Amazon pays us a small commission. There is no additional cost to you, so please contribute to the effort. You can also use this link to use to Amazon at any time so you can help support our efforts.
