|
Afflicted by Forces Unseen?
by David R. Hawkins M.D, Ph.D.
To become more conscious
is the
greatest gift
anyone can give to the world;
moreover, in a ripple effect,
the gift comes back to its source.
Humanity
is an "affliction" that we're all burdened with. We don't remember
asking to be born, and we subsequently inherited a mind so limited that it's
hardly capable of distinguishing what enhances life from what leads to death.
The entire struggle of life is in transcending this myopia. We can't enter into
higher levels of existence until we advance in consciousness to the point where
we overcome duality and are no longer earthbound. Perhaps it's because of our
collective will to transcend that we've earned the capacity to finally discover
an inborn compass to lead us out of the darkness of ignorance. We needed
something very simple, which could bypass those traps of the wily intellect that
we've paid such an enormous price for. This compass merely says yes or no -- it
tells us that what's aligned with heaven makes us go strong and what's aligned
with hell makes us go weak.
Human reason exhausts itself ceaselessly to explain the inexplicable.
Explanation itself is high comedy, as preposterous as trying to see the back of
one's own head, but the vanity of the ego is boundless, and it becomes even more
overblown by this very attempt to make sense of nonsense. The mind, in its
identity with the ego, cannot, by definition, comprehend reality; if it could,
it would instantly dissolve itself upon recognizing its own illusory nature.
It's only beyond the paradox of mind transcending ego that what Is stands forth,
self-evident and dazzling in its infinite Absoluteness. And then all of these
words are useless.
But perhaps from compassion for each other's blindness, we can learn to
forgive ourselves, and peace can then be our assured future. Our purpose on
Earth may remain obscure, but the road ahead is clear. We may expect great
transformations throughout human culture, as mankind becomes more responsible
for its knowledge, and thus its deeds. We've become fully accountable, whether
we like it or not. We're at the point in the evolution of our collective
awareness where we may even assume stewardship of consciousness itself. Humanity
is no longer resigned to passively paying the price of ignorance, or its
communal consciousness wouldn't have risen to its new level. From this time
forth, man may choose to no longer be enslaved by darkness; his destiny can then
be certain.
Today, many topics are exploding in the news media: (1) the perversion of
religion to the ends of political savagery; (2) the deepening depravity of
crimes; (3) the involvement of children in violence; (4) moral confusion in
politics; and (5) the bizarre violence of cults. All of these subjects appear
against a backdrop colored by the prevalence of lies as social tender and a lack
of consensus as to individual and collective responsibility toward one's fellow
man.
The larger social issue is how, in view of the dark side of mankind's
behavior, one can maintain compassion. It's a relative world; everyone acts from
his own level of truth and therefore believes that his actions and decisions are
"right" -- it's this very "rightness" that makes fanatics so
dangerous. But the real danger to society doesn't come from overt bigotry --
such as white supremacism -- as such damage can at least be monitored. The
really grave danger to society lies in the silent and invisible entrainment that
stealthily conquers the psyche. In this process, negative attractor fields are
covered up by rhetoric and the manipulation of symbols. Moreover, it isn't the
obvious message of the negative input that destroys consciousness, but the
energy field that accompanies it.
The extreme negativity of many popular works of pseudophilosophy, for
example, is obvious if one tests these books. But even being forewarned can't
defend us against unwitting entrainment by invisible energy fields that activate
when these works are read. One may think that he can maintain his psychic
independence by refuting the work intellectually, but mere exposure to the
material has a profound negative effect that continues even after the material
is intellectually rejected. It's as though, within these negative influences,
there's a hidden virus whose invasion of our psyche goes unnoticed.
Additionally, we often relax our circumspection when encountering material
that assigns the attributes of spiritual insight or religion to itself; we
forget that every heinous crime that man is capable of has been perpetrated in
the name of God. While violent cults may be clearly repellent, belief systems
that masquerade as piety are far more insidious, for they corrupt by the silent
entrainment of invisible attractor fields.
Here, it's best to heed the traditional wisdom that tells us not to fear evil
or fight it, but merely avoid it, yet in order to do so, one first has to have
the capacity to recognize it. Socrates said, in effect, that without such
capacity, youth (including the youth that continues to reside within every
adult) is corrupted by low-energy attractor fields. Although Socrates was put to
death for trying to teach this discernment, his entreaty remains: Obscurity is
dispelled by augmenting the light of discernment, not by attacking the darkness.
The final issue, then, is the problem of how we may best cultivate and preserve
the power of moral discretion.
Our journey of investigation has finally led us to the most critical
realization of all: Mankind lacks the capacity to recognize the difference
between truth and falsehood.
By humbly surrendering to this awareness, man may be forearmed. When we admit
that we're gullible and easily seduced by the senses and deluded by glamour
(including intellectual glamour), we have at least the beginning of discernment.
Fortunately, in this world of duality, man has been given a consciousness that
can instantly detect what's destructive and signal it to his otherwise ignorant
mind -- by the grossly visible weakening of his body in the presence of the
hostile stimuli. Wisdom can ultimately be reduced to the simple process of
avoiding what makes you go weak -- nothing else is really required.
Through frequent practice of this technique, spiritual blindness to truth and
falsehood can be progressively replaced by a growing intuitive vision. Some
lucky few seem born with this innate perceptivity; their lives remain and
undamaged by negative entrainment. But for most of us, life hasn't been so easy;
we've spent a great deal of it repairing the damage done by destructive
attractors that act like hypnosis. Recovering from a single addiction can take
up the majority of a lifetime -- and the most common and insidious addiction is
to denial, which "unenlightens" us through our intellectual vanity.
Contrary to its delusions of grandeur, the intellect not only lacks the
ability to recognize falsehood, but also grossly lacks the necessary power to
defend itself, even if it had the capacity for discernment. Is it irreverent, in
light of history's enormous collection of works of intellectual speculation, to
say that man's boasted capacity of reason lacks the critical faculty of
discernment? The entire field of philosophy is merely evidence that man has
struggled and failed for thousands of years to arrive at the simplest
recognition of what's true and what's false, or the discourse would have reached
some consensus long ago. And it's clear from common human conduct that even if
the intellect could reliably arrive at this basic conclusion, it still lacks the
power to stop the effect of negative fields. We remain unconscious of the causes
of our afflictions while the intellect dreams up all kinds of plausible excuses,
hypnotized by these same forces. Even when a person intellectually knows his
behavior is self-destructive, this knowledge has no necessary deterrent effect
whatsoever; intellectual recognition of our addictions has never given us the
power to control them.
In scripture, we're told that man is afflicted by forces unseen. In this
century, we've learned that silent, invisible rays of energy are emitted by
innocent-looking objects -- the discoverers of radium paid for this realization
with their lives. Roentgen x-rays are lethal; radioactive emissions and radon
kill silently. The attractor energy fields that destroy us are equally invisible
and no less powerful, but they're far more subtle.
When it's said that someone is "possessed," what's meant is that
his consciousness has become dominated by negative attractor fields. By this
definition, we can see that entire segments of society are so thoroughly
"possessed" that they themselves are totally unconscious of their
motives. Wisdom tells us that one worships either heaven or hell and will
eventually become the servant of one or the other. Hell isn't a condition
imposed by a judgmental God, but rather the inevitable consequence of one's own
decisions -- it's the final outcome of constantly choosing the negative and thus
isolating oneself from love.
Enlightened beings have always described the general populace as being
"trapped in a dream"; the majority of people are driven by unseen
forces, and for a great deal of our lives, most of us are in despair over this
fact. We pray to God to relieve us of the burden of our sins, and we look for
relief through confession. Remorse seems woven into the fabric of life. How can
salvation be possible, then, for those who have unwittingly become ensnared by
such destructive influence?
In fact, even from a merely scientific viewpoint, salvation is indeed
possible; in truth, it's guaranteed by the simple fact that the energy of a
loving thought is enormously more powerful than that of a negative one.
Therefore, the traditional solutions of love and prayer have a sound scientific
basis; man has within his own essence the power of his own salvation.
This
article is excerpted from Power vs. Force, ©1995, 1998, 2002, by David
R. Hawkins. Reprinted with permission of the publisher, Hay House Inc. www.hayhouse.com
Info/Order
this book.
About the Author
Dr.
David R. Hawkins is a renowned lecturer and expert on mental processes whose
national TV appearances include The MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour and the Today show.
A lifetime member of the American Psychiatric Association, he began work in
psychiatry in 1952. Since relinquishing his extensive New York practice for a
life of research, he continues spiritual teaching. Dr. Hawkins is the author of
numerous scientific papers and videotapes; in 1973 he co authored-the innovative
work Orthomolecular
Psychiatry with
Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling. Dr. Hawkins is currently the director of The
Institute for Advanced Theoretical Research.
Printer Friendly Page |